This page contains information about Australian immigration law sourced from official government legislation. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute immigration advice. For advice specific to your circumstances, consult a registered migration agent (MARN).

Some content on this page was compiled with AI assistance. While based on official sources, it may contain inaccuracies — always verify against the source document linked on this page.

Section 363A — Natural justice hearing rule excluded

Migration Act 1958 s 363A Australia Compilation: 18 May 2026 Verified: 2026-05-23

Text of provision

Section 363A — verbatim text unavailable.

Plain English

Section 363A provides that the rules of natural justice (including the hearing rule and the bias rule) do not apply to the exercise of powers by the ART in the migration review jurisdiction, except to the extent expressly required by the Migration Act. This codifies the procedural fairness obligations in the Act itself, replacing the common law natural justice rules.

Practical effect

The displacement of common law natural justice by statutory provisions means that ART procedure in migration matters is governed exclusively by the Migration Act, not by general administrative law principles. The consequence is that procedural unfairness in ART proceedings must be assessed against the specific statutory provisions (such as the invitation to comment provisions) rather than the common law. This limits the ability of applicants to challenge ART decisions on natural justice grounds outside the Act's own framework. The bias rule remains applicable to the extent it is a jurisdictional requirement.

Information only. Nothing on this page is immigration advice or legal advice. Only a registered migration agent (MARN) or Australian lawyer may give immigration advice.

© 2026 IMMI.TV PTY LTD (ABN 61 685 250 784) — Privacy · Terms · About Last reviewed: 2026-05-23