This page contains information about Canadian immigration law sourced from official government legislation. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute immigration advice. For advice specific to your circumstances, consult an authorised representative (RCIC or immigration lawyer).

Some content on this page was compiled with AI assistance. While based on official sources, it may contain inaccuracies — always verify against the source document linked on this page.

Judicial review (immigration — Canada)

Glossary 🇨🇦 IRPA ss 72–75; Federal Courts Act, ss 18–18.5 Current to: 2026-03-17 Verified: 2026-05-23

Statutory definition

IRPA s 72 provides that judicial review of immigration matters may only be made to the Federal Court. Section 74(b) (the privative clause) limits appeals from the Federal Court to the Federal Court of Appeal only where the judge certifies a serious question of general importance. Applicants must apply for leave within 15 days (refugee matters) or 60 days (other immigration matters) of the decision. Leave is granted if the application raises an arguable issue.

Explanation

Judicial review is the primary legal remedy for challenging erroneous immigration decisions. The standard of review is typically "reasonableness" — the court asks whether the decision falls within the range of acceptable, defensible outcomes. Procedural fairness questions are reviewed on a correctness standard. The leave requirement filters out weak applications. If leave is granted, the hearing is typically on the record (no new evidence). The Federal Court cannot substitute its own decision — it can only quash the decision and refer the matter back for re-determination by a different officer.

How this term is used

Information only. Nothing on this page is immigration advice or legal advice. Only an authorised representative (RCIC or immigration lawyer) may give immigration advice in Canada.

© 2026 IMMI.TV PTY LTD (ABN 61 685 250 784) — Privacy · Terms · About Last reviewed: 2026-05-23