This page contains information about Canadian immigration law sourced from official government legislation. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute immigration advice. For advice specific to your circumstances, consult an authorised representative (RCIC or immigration lawyer).

Some content on this page was compiled with AI assistance. While based on official sources, it may contain inaccuracies — always verify against the source document linked on this page.

Misrepresentation (IRPA s 40)

Glossary 🇨🇦 IRPA s 40 Current to: 2026-03-17 Verified: 2026-05-23

Statutory definition

IRPA s 40(1) provides that a permanent resident or foreign national is inadmissible for misrepresentation for directly or indirectly misrepresenting or withholding material facts relating to a relevant matter that induces or could induce an error in the administration of the IRPA. IRPA s 40(2) provides that the inadmissibility period is 5 years from the date of: the refusal, removal, or grant of status on the basis of the misrepresentation.

Explanation

Misrepresentation is one of the most serious inadmissibility grounds in Canadian immigration law. It applies to: omitting information on forms; providing false documents; having a third party (such as a ghost consultant) submit a fraudulent application; and failing to disclose a previous refusal, overstay, or criminal conviction. The 5-year bar applies even if the misrepresentation was made innocently — only the materiality of the fact matters. A PR who misrepresented during the original application may lose PR status. Practitioners should always review applications for inadvertent omissions before submission.

How this term is used

Information only. Nothing on this page is immigration advice or legal advice. Only an authorised representative (RCIC or immigration lawyer) may give immigration advice in Canada.

© 2026 IMMI.TV PTY LTD (ABN 61 685 250 784) — Privacy · Terms · About Last reviewed: 2026-05-23