This page contains information about Canadian immigration law sourced from official government legislation. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute immigration advice. For advice specific to your circumstances, consult an authorised representative (RCIC or immigration lawyer).

Some content on this page was compiled with AI assistance. While based on official sources, it may contain inaccuracies — always verify against the source document linked on this page.

Security inadmissibility (IRPA s 34)

Glossary 🇨🇦 IRPA s 34 Current to: 2026-03-17 Verified: 2026-05-23

Statutory definition

IRPA s 34(1) provides that a person is inadmissible on security grounds for engaging or having engaged in: espionage or an act or omission outside Canada that would constitute espionage in Canada; subversion by force; terrorism; acts of violence that would endanger lives in Canada; being a member of an organisation that engages in any of the above; and being a danger to the security of Canada. Section 34(2) provides that s 34 does not apply if the person satisfies the Minister that their presence is not contrary to the national interest.

Explanation

Security inadmissibility under s 34 is separate from criminality inadmissibility and is assessed by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) and CBSA. Persons who are inadmissible under s 34 cannot obtain a TRP to enter Canada unless the Minister grants relief under s 42.1. The s 34(2) national interest exception creates a pathway but requires a high threshold showing — the person must demonstrate that their presence is consistent with the national interest. This exception has been interpreted narrowly by the courts.

How this term is used

Information only. Nothing on this page is immigration advice or legal advice. Only an authorised representative (RCIC or immigration lawyer) may give immigration advice in Canada.

© 2026 IMMI.TV PTY LTD (ABN 61 685 250 784) — Privacy · Terms · About Last reviewed: 2026-05-23