This page contains information about Canadian immigration law sourced from official government legislation. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute immigration advice. For advice specific to your circumstances, consult an authorised representative (RCIC or immigration lawyer).

Some content on this page was compiled with AI assistance. While based on official sources, it may contain inaccuracies — always verify against the source document linked on this page.

Stay of removal

Glossary 🇨🇦 Federal Courts Act, s 18.2; IRB Rules (tribunal stays) Current to: 2026-03-17 Verified: 2026-05-23

Statutory definition

Section 18.2 of the Federal Courts Act authorises the Federal Court to grant a stay of proceedings pending judicial review where the balance of convenience favours the stay. In immigration cases, the standard for a stay is: (1) a serious question to be tried; (2) irreparable harm if removal proceeds (usually because the claimant fears persecution); and (3) balance of convenience favours the stay. Automatic statutory stays apply during IAD appeal processes in most cases.

Explanation

A stay of removal is a critical and time-sensitive remedy. Practitioners seeking a stay must typically file an emergency motion with the Federal Court on very short notice before the removal flight. The application must demonstrate a strong arguable case for judicial review and irreparable harm from removal. If the judicial review application ultimately fails, the stay is lifted and removal proceeds. Some appeals to the IAD carry automatic stays — practitioners should check whether an automatic stay applies before seeking a court stay.

How this term is used

Information only. Nothing on this page is immigration advice or legal advice. Only an authorised representative (RCIC or immigration lawyer) may give immigration advice in Canada.

© 2026 IMMI.TV PTY LTD (ABN 61 685 250 784) — Privacy · Terms · About Last reviewed: 2026-05-23